Friday 24 August 2012

Singapore Airlines vs Social Media Policy

I had really enjoyed the speech by Mr. Malcolm Burrows last night. It was a fantastic one! I mean, I hardly knew the laws behind the online stuff, but what Mr. Burrows had shared was just incredible. No -  I swear that I am not trying to bootlick, but I think I would appreciate using the internet and social media with much more cautions now, and be even more conservative with what I post and support online, even.













Photo credits by : Lauri Stevens





Found it especially interesting when he brought in a facebook case, which was a rather complex one, which involved parties in different countries.

For this week, I would like to share about Singapore Airlines.. (no, not because of the fact that I am a Singaporean, nor is it the fact that I fly with Singapore Airlines often.) I have recently gotten more interested about this organisation after chatting with my boyfriend's brother who was working for them in the London office for the Europe region.(obviously a British..)

Not sure if Singapore Airlines is famous enough internationally, then again, I think it should be pretty famous, given that every single month, they win all sorts of possible awards internationally across different countries like UK, US, Germany, Turkey, China, Holland...just to name a handful really. The List of awards can go on if you want me to..but I will leave you at that.

So here I am, sharing with you some basic but pretty impressive information about Singapore Airlines(no, I'm not boasting, neither am I having any sense of national pride, I just would like to share, in that sense.)
Singapore Airlines was apparantly founded in 1972, and was the first in the world in the following activities :
- Free headsets, variety of meals and drinks in Economy class
- Introduction of inflight telephones in 1991
- Involvement of a panel of world-renowned chefs in 1998
- Audio and Video on-demand(AVOD) on all flights in 2001
- Flying of the A380 from Singapore to Sydney on 25th October 2007.
Just to name a few of them.
















I have only just discovered today that Singapore Airlines has got its fanpage on our favourite(or at least most of us..) Facebook as well as on Twitter. Apparantly it was started by a real fan of SIA on facebook, and they had then taken that over from that fan, on 5th of September, 2011, with a total count of over 100,000 fans. That is really not that many - if you think about it. Given that it is known to be a world renowned airline. Disappointing to me. Till date, it has about slightly less than 180,000 fans.

Anyway, very unfortunately, after doing all my research, I was not able to find any known cases of the airline getting into trouble with social media policy and the law. However, based on what I have been communicating with one of the top directors in the organisation(sorry, I cannot name names here, as it is highly confidential), here is what I have to say.

Firstly, based on what I have heard, the thing is that within the organisations, only the staff who require the access to the internet for their job, are given the access rights. - which sounds rather insane to me - because if  the organisation is not in Singapore, I believe access to the internet can be considered even as a human right in certain countries, like Estonia, France, Greece and Spain.

Next, for those who are given the access rights to the internet at work, the websites that they visit, it is not being monitored, unless, the IT administrator gets notified of a huge chunk of bandwidth being taken up by that particular user. That said, it is very unlikely, unless the employee actually dares to stream video at work, during working hours. Or worse, surfing pornographic sites at work. That might be too late for the administrator to even get involved. In the worst case scenario, say,the employee has already downloaded quite a number of those obscene videos on his work desk computer. That, might have been tracked down by the police in Singapore. In that case, the employee, would have already gotten in trouble with the law, ruining the reputation of Singapore Airlines, should the police force head down to the employee's desk to search for the material.














Lastly, what if any of their employees, were to blog, or even update a status on facebook, after taking a flight with Singapore Airlines itself, and had received rather poor service(although really rare- as it opposes the organisation's values). Should he/she be fired? Is it right for that employee to post that, after working hours, on his/her own personal computer? Who is to restrict that? Who should be regulating that? (I'm just saying in my opinion that..)It would not be quite right for SIA to fire that particular employee, since he/she was not using the company's resources, to start with, and that was outside of working hours.

What do you think?

Interesting articles I found:
Singapore Airlines finally connecting on social media
Fanpage of Singapore Airlines that turned into an official page
How is a community different from a network?
Behaving appropriately online

11 comments:

  1. Hi Yvonne,

    I think the employee would still be liable if the account they posted from is clearly affiliated with Singapore airlines. As an employee a comment like that could generate a lot of commotion and result in a larger reputation loss than someone unaffiliated with the company.

    I would expect employees to bring issues like that to the attention of their organizations rather than publicize it to the world.

    Thanks for the read and I hope you're enjoying your pint!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Adam!

      I sure did enjoy my pints last night!
      Yes, I agree with you, as much as they wish to publicise their anger on the customer service, having to also work for the organisation, they really should be doing the complaint internally rather than through the means of social media, which can land them in hot soup.

      Delete
  2. Hi Yvonne,

    Interesting post.

    I think the simple answer to your question is that it is not worth the risk. Sure, you may technically have the write to voice your grievances but if you care about keeping your Job it is not a good idea.

    Simply vent offline to your mum, your boyfriend, girlfriend or dog. Just keep it OFFLINE.

    Check me out at http://www.adamhijazi.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Adam,

      thanks for the compliment!
      Definitely, I guess, if you really are passionate about your job, or even the organisation you are working for, you will not even make those comments I reckon, especially when you publicise that externally to the world via social media.

      Delete
  3. Hi Yvonne,

    The lecture was quite an eye opener to me too. It got me thinking on a few things that I have not considered on the legal side of things.

    I think as an employee, they should still be respectful of their employer and not publicly criticise their employer. If they are unhappy about the service or even treatment at work, it should be lodged via the proper channel and not via social media that is viewable publicly. If they disclose in their profile that they are working for SIA, then they might be hold liable for the comments.
    Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Karen,

      that was a great speech, wasn't it!

      yeah, indeed my point exactly. If one is an employee, and you were actually given a (moreover)free ticket, all the more, you should be fair to your company, and lodge a complain through internal channels.

      Otherwise, they have only themselves to blame if things get out of hand and into the hands of the law.

      Delete
  4. Hi Yvonne!

    I don't know why the Blogspot is not recongnizing my identity, so here it goes:

    http://jacqueskerguelen.wordpress.com

    Now, really interesting the topic that you brought up! Why a giant company such us Singapour Airlines has been reluctant to Social Media?

    I don't know much about SIA as I am from Latin-America, which is not a region covered by SIA. The information that I have about Singapore Airlines are the billboards on the street, showing that they are a world-class airline and that have won important awards and now the information that I am reading from your blog and references. My opinion is not well-informed at all, but anyway here is what I think:

    Singapore Airlines is a service-focused organization that strives to keep a high satisfaction in their customers and that is the main competitive advantage of them; that is what has been help them to become the high-profile and successful corporation that they now are. Even though, they have not being very active in Social Media, that hasn´t affected their performance. Maybe, their target market is not as keen in Social Media as Delta target market. Or maybe Social Media is not yet as critical to position or take out a status of an established firm.

    According to one of your references, the spokeswoman from SIA was saying that now they are into Social Media, but from her statements I figured out that for now, they don't want to be in the leading edge in that field. I think that is a conservative corporation that is doing the things that have worked for them. But now, I think in another question: They haven't been conservative in the past, they have been innovating with their services, as you said: the were the first to give away headsets, the first to use A380 Airbus, Why they are so conservative about Social Media? That's a good question!

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Jaques,

    no worries, I was actually able to click to your blog through your nickname! ;)

    Erm, actually, they have only just started flying to Brazil-Sao Paolo last year.., slowly venturing into the latino market i reckon.

    Yeah, you definitely did your research on Singapore Airlines. Indeed they have only started to open up to social media, however, they are pretty conservative on doing that. I might be wrong-but I think they must surely be aware of the negative impact of how other major oganisations have been hit 'thanks to social media'..

    Hope my guess is correct though.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey,

    I believe that people should stop using social media such as Facebook to criticise their employers. There are already other official means by which to do that.

    I don't feel as if a company should be held liable for the online actions of an employee provided that the incident occurs outside business hours from a personal device.

    --Jason

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jason,

      indeed thaey should not. Especially not in the case above, when it's actually a staff benefit to get a free annual ticket.

      Your opinion is correct to a certain extent. However, imagine, if the employee wears a company logo t-shirt, and behaves badly in public, i guess that will bring very bad reputation to the company. Again, that is unstoppable. Then again, the next action the company can take is to fire that particular employee to show that they do not tolerate such behaviour of their employees.

      Delete
  7. Hi Yvonne,

    I love your idea and I mentioned before that the case of Ericsson, they really did well. Wiki involves huge amount of information which can be classified into different types and be used by corresponding purposes. It is also a good way that allows interaction between customers and the company. Maybe we just have to worry about the cost of training people how to use the system and be familiar with it.

    Leo

    ReplyDelete